IBAT vs QCLN
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF compared with First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund on yield, payout growth, payment schedule, cost and risk.
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
TTM yield · Semi-annual
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
TTM yield · Quarterly
Quick take
- IBAT yields more today: 0.89% vs 0.06% (forward).
- IBAT has grown its payout faster: -7.6%/yr vs -46.5%/yr over the last 1 year.
- IBAT pays twice a year; QCLN pays every quarter.
- Over the last year IBAT delivered the higher total return: +63.6% vs +30.6% (price change plus payouts).
- IBAT is cheaper to own: 0.47% vs 0.59% expense ratio.
- IBAT has the steadier distribution: consistency 78/100 vs 24/100.
Generated from the latest data on both pages. Not a recommendation.
Side by side
| Metric | IBAT | QCLN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $41.28 | $49.43 |
| TTM yield | 0.74% | 0.17% |
| Forward yield | 0.89% | 0.06% |
| Annual payout per share | $0.366 | $0.028 |
| Payment frequency | Semi-annual | Quarterly |
| Next ex-date | Dec 14, 2026 (est.) | Sep 24, 2026 (est.) |
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.59% |
| 1-year payout growth | -7.6% | -46.5% |
| 5-year payout CAGR | — | -2.9% |
| Consecutive years of increases | 1 year | 1 year |
| Payout consistency (last 12) | 78/100 | 24/100 |
| 1-year total return | +63.6% | +30.6% |
| 1-year price return | +62.4% | +30.4% |
| Size (market cap / AUM) | 68.1M | 557.6M |
| Years paying | 2.2 | 14.0 |
| Sector / category | Miscellaneous Sector | Miscellaneous Sector |
✓ marks the more favourable figure where one exists (higher yield, growth, streak, consistency, return and size; lower cost, payout ratio and risk).
$10,000 invested today
| IBAT | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Shares | 242.3 | 202.3 |
| Income per year | $89 | $6 |
| Income per month (avg) | $7 | $0 |
At forward yields, before taxes. Model IBAT · Model QCLN
Next payments
| Ex-date | Pay date | Per share | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBAT Dec 14, 2026 | Dec 17, 2026 | $0.183 | Est. |
| IBAT Jun 14, 2027 | Jun 17, 2027 | $0.183 | Est. |
| QCLN Sep 24, 2026 | Sep 30, 2026 | $0.007 | Est. |
| QCLN Dec 24, 2026 | Dec 30, 2026 | $0.007 | Est. |
| QCLN Mar 25, 2027 | Mar 31, 2027 | $0.007 | Est. |
Annual payouts per share
IBATQCLN
Regular payments only; the current year is year to date. Per-share amounts are not directly comparable when share prices differ, so read this chart for growth trends.
FAQ
Which has the higher dividend yield, IBAT or QCLN?
IBAT currently has the higher trailing yield: IBAT yields 0.74% and QCLN yields 0.17%. Yield changes daily with price, so check the live figures above.
How often do IBAT and QCLN pay?
IBAT pays twice a year and QCLN pays every quarter. IBAT's next ex-date is Dec 14, 2026 and QCLN's is Sep 24, 2026.
Which has grown its dividend faster, IBAT or QCLN?
IBAT has grown its payout faster: -7.6%/yr vs -46.5%/yr over the last 1 year.
Is IBAT or QCLN better for income?
It depends on what you are optimising for. IBAT and QCLN differ in yield, growth, payment schedule and risk profile; the table above puts every metric side by side so you can weigh them for your own goals. This page is data, not advice.